) STOKES COUNTY GOVERNMENT
COUNTY OF STOKES ) DANBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
) FEBRUARY 2, 2010
The Board of
Commissioners of the County of Stokes, State of North Carolina, met
for regular session (Planning) in the Commissioners’ Chambers of the
Ronald Wilson Reagan
Memorial Building (Administration Building) located in Danbury, North
Carolina on Tuesday,
February 2, 2010 at 7:00 pm with the following members present:
Chairman Jimmy
Walker
Vice-Chairman
Ernest Lankford
Commissioner
J. Leon Inman
Commissioner
Stanley Smith
Commissioner
Ron Carroll - absent
County Personnel in Attendance:
County
Manager K. Bryan Steen
Clerk
to the Board Darlene Bullins
Planning
Director David Sudderth
Chairman Jimmy Walker called the meeting to
order.
Commissioner Inman delivered the invocation.
Chairman Walker noted that Commissioner
Carroll would not be present due to a family
illness.
Chairman Walker opened
the meeting by inviting the citizens in attendance to join the
Board with the Pledge of Allegiance.
GENERAL
GOVERNMENT – GOVERNING BODY – APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Chairman Walker entertained a motion to
approve or amend the February 2, 2010
Agenda.
Commissioner Inman moved to approve the February
2, 2010 Agenda as presented.
Vice Chairman Lankford seconded and the motion carried (4-0) with
Commissioner Carroll absent.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
SPEICAL USE REQUEST – GREGORY E. WILLARD #216 –
(Special Use Permit for Amusements/Recreational
Facilities – Fishing Lakes)
PUBLIC
HEARING/PRESENTATION/DISCUSSION/ACTION AGENDAS
PUBLIC HEARING
Chairman Walker
called to order the Public Hearing for the Rezoning Request #216 –
Gregory E. Willard (Special Use Permit for
Amusements/Recreational Facilities – Fishing Lakes).
There were no
public comments.
Chairman
Walker closed the Public Hearing.
PRESENTATION
Planning Director David Sudderth noted that Mr. Willard requested that
his request for a
Special Use Permit
be held over until the March 25, 2010 Planning Board meeting and the
April 6, 2010 Board
of Commissioners’ meeting in order to address some issues concerning the
property.
Planning Director Sudderth noted
that the Planning Board recommended by a vote of 6 to 0
that the
Special Use Request #216 by Gregory E. Willard for an Amusement/Recreational
Facilities
for Profit
(outdoors) – Fishing Lakes be postponed to the March 25th Planning
Board meeting and the
April 6th
Commissioners’ meeting.
Chairman Walker entertained a
motion.
Vice Chairman Lankford moved to
honor the applicant’s request to postpone the Special
Use Permit
#216 to the March 25th Planning Board meeting and the April 6th
Commissioners’
meeting. Commissioner Smith seconded and the motion
carried (4-0) with Commissioner Carroll
absent.
GENERAL GOVERNMENT – ADAM ANTHONY POLICASTRO #217 –
(RA TO RE-CU for a 3-lot residential subdivision)
PUBLIC
HEARING/PRESENTATION/DISCUSSION/ACTION AGENDAS
PUBLIC HEARING
Chairman Walker
called to order the Public Hearing for the Rezoning Request #217 –
Adam Anthony Policastro (RA to RE-CU for a
3-lot residential subdivision).
There were no
public comments.
Chairman
Walker closed the Public Hearing.
Commissioner
Inman stated the following:
·
He currently holds a
valid real estate license in the State of North Carolina and practices real
estate
·
Mr. Policastro’s property
is currently listed by Carolina Farms and Homes Real Estate
·
He has an ownership
interest in Carolina Farms and Homes
Commissioner
Inman noted that he feels this would be a direct conflict of interest to
participate in this particular zoning request
and requested to be recused.
Chairman
Walker entertained a motion.
Vice
Chairman Lankford moved to honor Commissioner Inman’s request to be recused
from this zoning request. Commissioner Smith seconded and the motion
carried (4-0) with
Commissioner Carroll absent. Commissioner Inman exited the meeting.
PRESENTATION
Planning Director David Sudderth presented the following information
regarding
Rezoning
Request #217 – Adam A. Policastro (RA to RE-CU for a 3-lot residential subdivision):
REQUEST: Rezone approximately 29.486 acres from RA (Residential Agricultural) to RE-CU (Residential Exclusive Conditional Use) for a 3-lot residential subdivision.
SITE OWNER: Adam Anthony Policastro
APPLICANT: Adam Anthony Policastro
SITE LOCATION: The property is located at the intersection of Hauser Rd. (SR#1983) and Buenavista Dr. (private rd. #16609).
Map: 5986 Parcel: 3851 PIN #: 5986-00-95-3851
Deed Book: 555 Page: 1213 Township: Quaker Gap
SITE INFORMATION:
PARCEL SIZE: Total tract 29.486 acres
ZONING DISTRICT: RA (Residential Agricultural)
PROPOSED DISTRICT: RE-CU
(Residential Exclusive Conditional Use) for a 3-lot subdivision. One of the
proposed lots, tract two, has an existing home located on it.
FLOOD HAZARD AREA: Not
located in flood hazard area.
FIRM MAP #: 3710598600J
FIRM MAP ZONE: Zone
X - Area outside 500-year floodplain.
WATERSHED DISTRICT: WS-IV
SEPTIC/WATER
APPROVAL: The site has been
evaluated and was found to be suitable for septic disposal systems by Joseph A.
Hinton, a licensed soil scientist. Proposed tract 2 has an existing home and
septic system already located on it. New septic systems will be permitted by
the Stokes County Environmental Health Department. All properties will be
served by wells.
SCHOOL DISTRICTS: Pinnacle,
Chestnut Grove Middle, West Stokes High
EMERGENCY SERVICES: Double
Creek VFD, EMS – Pinnacle Station # 103 & 104
EROSION CONTROL: Plan submittal will only be required if more than one acre of land is disturbed during the construction process.
ACCESS: Access for the proposed lots would be off
of Hauser Road (SR#1983) Buenavista Drive.
A 50 ft. private easement (private rd. # 16609) currently serves two lots at
the end of the private road. Conveyance of proposed lots is subject to the private
easement known as Buenavista Drive as described indeed Book 470, pages 1725 and
1727, Stokes County Registry.
SURROUNDING LAND USE: Proposed tracts 1 and 3 are currently vacant, proposed tract 2 has an existing stick built home located on it. The remaining surrounding property is zoned RA (Residential Agricultural) and is used primarily for residential and agricultural purposes. The RE-CU (Residential Exclusive Conditional Use) zoning district allows for the placement of modular housing, and stick-built homes. The request is consistent with the housing types within the immediate vicinity of the proposed site.
ISSUES TO
CONSIDER:
· Consistency with surrounding housing types.
STAFF COMMENTS: This rezoning request comes to the Board as a request for a Conditional Use Rezoning for a 3-lot residential subdivision to be rezoned to RE-CU (Residential Exclusive Conditional Use). This district would allow stick built and modular homes. The request is necessary because the proposed 3- lot subdivision would exceed the number of subdivision cuts that can be allowed on a parent parcel by the Stokes County Subdivision Regulations. The addition of two homes in this area should not pose a substantial burden on the community infrastructure. The proposed tract 2 (12.205 acres) has an existing stick built home located on it. The rezoning of all tracts to RE-CU (Residential Exclusive Conditional Use) will assure that the entire 29.486 acres will be utilized for stick built homes. The Planning staff has no problem with this request.
PLANNING BOARD
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning
Board voted 6 to 0 to recommend approval of rezoning request #217 for Adam
Anthony Policastro . The Board also recommended by the same unanimous vote the
Conditional Use Permit with the following twelve (12) proposed conditions. The
owner’s agent,
DISCUSSION – REZONING REQUEST
The Board discussed the request with Director Sudderth.
Director Sudderth noted that a few
neighbors attended the Planning Board meeting and the
office
received several calls to inquire about the rezoning request. After explaining
the rezoning
request, no
one had any issues or opposition with the rezoning request.
Director Sudderth noted the Planning
Board added the proposed recommended condition #12: (Staff recommended
conditions 1-11)
Vice Chairman Lankford confirmed
with Director Sudderth that if a property owner wanted
(the parcels
being large) to subdivide their parcel, a rezoning request would have to be
brought back
to the
Planning Board and the Board of Commissioners.
ACTION – REZONING REQUEST
Chairman Walker entertained a
motion.
Commissioner Smith moved to honor
the Planning Board’s recommendation to approve
Rezoning
Request #217 - Adam A. Policastro (RA TO RE-CU for a 3-lot residential subdivision).
Vice Chairman Lankford seconded and the motion
carried (3-0) with Commissioner Carroll absent
and Commissioner Inman approved to be recused.
DISCUSSION – CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Director Sudderth presented the following
conditions that were recommended by the Planning
Board: (The Board may add or
delete conditions as they deem necessary for the proper development
of the proposal). Director Sudderth reiterated the owner’s agent, Mr.
Al Engler, a Realtor with
Carolina Farms and Homes, was in agreement with the proposed conditions
recommended by the
Planning Board.
Proposed Recommended Conditions for Adam Anthony Policastro RE-CU #217
2.
Adequate storm water facilities shall be provided for each
lot, including the placement of NCDOT approved drain tile under each driveway
if needed.
3.
All improvements shall be completed before final subdivision
approval is granted by the (SRC) Subdivision Review Committee.
4.
All required permits must be obtained from the County
Inspections Department prior to placing
structures on the property, as well as any signage that may accompany the
project.
5. Each dwelling unit shall also have a
visible lot number in a numbering scheme approved by the County to facilitate
rapid emergency response (E- 911).
6. If conflict arises between any conditions or the developer’s proposed site plan or written text, the most stringent conditions or requirements shall be considered the governing requirement.
7.
All costs and expenses associated with complying with these
conditions shall be borne by the landowner/developer, with no expense being
borne by the County.
9.
The Rules and Regulations of the Developer, as modified by
the developer at the prior hearing (s) on this request, shall not be
inconsistent with these conditions. Any
conflict between said Rules and Regulations shall be resolved in favor of these
conditions.
Director Sudderth
discussed recommended condition #12 with the Board.
Director Sudderth noted that in approving a Conditional Use Permit, the Board should follow
these guidelines, respond, and vote on each of the following items concerning the issuance of a
Conditional Use Permit:
The responsible body shall approve, modify, or deny the application for Conditional Use following the public hearing. In granting a Conditional Use Permit, the responsible body shall insure:
(a) The requested use is listed among the conditional uses in the district for which application is made. (yes/3-0) Commissioner Carroll absent and Commissioner Inman approved to be recused
(b) The requested use is essential or desirable to the public convenience or welfare. (yes/3-0) Commissioner Carroll absent and Commissioner Inman approved to be recused
(c) The requested use will not impair the integrity or character of the surrounding or adjoining districts, nor be detrimental to the health, morals, or welfare. (yes/3-0) Commissioner Carroll absent and Commissioner Inman approved to be recused
(d) Due consideration has been given to the suitability of the property for the use applied for with respect to trends of growth or change; the effect of the proposed use upon the community; requirements for transportation, schools, parks, playgrounds, recreational area, conservation of natural resources, preservation of floodplains, and encouraging the most appropriate use of the land. (yes/3-0) Commissioner Carroll absent and Commissioner Inman approved to be recused
(e) Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage, sanitation and/or other necessary facilities have been or are being provided. (yes/3-0) Commissioner Carroll absent and Commissioner Inman approved to be recused
(f) That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. (yes/3-0) Commissioner Carroll absent and Commissioner Inman approved to be recused
ACTION -
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Chairman Walker
entertained a motion.
Vice Chairman Lankford
moved to approve the Conditional Use Permit for Adam Anthony
Policastro (RA to RE-CU #217). Commissioner
Smith seconded and the motion carried (3-0) with
Commissioner Carroll absent and Commissioner Inman approved to be
recused.
Commissioner Inman
re-entered the meeting.
Adjournment
There being no further business to come before
the Board, Chairman Walker entertained
a motion to adjourn the meeting.
Commissioner Smith moved to adjourn the
meeting. Commissioner Inman seconded
the motion.
Vice Chairman Lankford
requested revenue information from Director Sudderth.
Director Sudderth
noted that the department is currently exceeding revenue projections, but
unsure what the building season that usually starts up in March will
be.
Director Sudderth
noted that with the Nancy Reynolds renovation project, it will probably
take the majority of one worker’s time.
Commissioner Smith
requested information regarding the status of sending out condemnation
letters to property owners to clean up their property.
Director Sudderth
noted that letters could be sent at anytime with direction from the Board,
but the Board needed to know that the County could incur some expenses
with this type of action.
The Board discussed
the issue with Director Sudderth pertaining to some specific locations
in the County (Highway #66).
Director Sudderth
noted that he could make a call to the property owner and report back
to the Board at the next meeting.
The motion carried (4-0) with Commissioner
Carroll absent.
_________________________
_____________________________
Darlene M.
Bullins
Jimmy Walker
Clerk to the
Board Chairman