) STOKES COUNTY GOVERNMENT
COUNTY OF STOKES ) DANBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
) FEBRUARY 25, 2006
The Board of Commissioners of the County of Stokes, State of North
Carolina, met for special session (Budget Retreat) in the Commissioners’
Chambers of the Ronald Wilson Reagan Memorial Building (Administrative
Building) located in Danbury, North Carolina on Saturday, February 25, 2006 at
8:30 am with the following members present:
Chairman
Leon Inman
Vice-Chairman
Joe Turpin
Commissioner
Sandy McHugh
Commissioner
John Turpin
Commissioner
Jimmy Walker
County
Personnel in Attendance:
Clerk
to the Board/Interim County Manager Darlene Bullins
Budget
Director Dennis Thompson
Finance
Director Julia Edwards
Assistant
Finance Director Lisa Lankford
Tax
Administrator Wren Carmichael
Stokes
County Schools
Dr.
Larry Cartner - Superintendent
Chairman Leon Inman called the meeting to order.
Dr. Larry Cartner delivered the invocation.
Chairman Inman opened the meeting by inviting the citizens in
attendance to join the Board with the Pledge of Allegiance.
GENERAL GOVERNMENT –
GOVERNING BODY – BUDGET RETREAT
Chairman Inman presented opening remarks and expressed appreciation o
each member for their participation.
Budget Director Dennis Thompson explained the following regarding the
BudgetRetreat:
·
Review the
status of revenues for Fiscal Year 2004/05 and Fiscal Year
2005-06 and receive preliminary information
regarding Fiscal Year 2006-07
revenues
·
Review the
status and outlook of departmental programs
·
Discussions on
current and long range issues and goals
·
Opportunity to instruct
the Budget Team on the Fiscal Year 2006-07 budget process
TAX ADMINISTRATION
Tax Administrator Wren Carmichael noted the following:
·
Tax
Administration Office to meet the amounts projected for the fiscal year 2005-06
budget
·
Expenditures to
be at budget
·
No anticipation
of any new programs, major capital requests, or major changes in Tax
Administration or Revaluation budget for the upcoming year
·
Long range needs
– full time position to be in charge of bankruptcy accounts
·
Garnishments are
increasing daily
·
Real Property
Valuations – Estimated $2,314,098,438 for 2006
·
Personal
Property Valuation – Estimated $154 million for 2006
·
Total of Real
and Personal Property Valuation - $2,468,098,438 for 2006
·
Utilities
Valuation - $355,000,000 for 2006
·
Total County
Valuation Estimate - $3,143,098,438 for 2006
·
Motor Vehicles
collections to be taken over by the State in 2009
·
2004/05
Collection rate of 95.37% increasing
·
Recent tax appeal in Raleigh – ruled
in favor of Stokes County
Tax Administrator Carmichael presented and explained a revised
Collection Status Fiscal Year 2004-05 versus Fiscal Year 2005-06.
Vice Chairman Joe Turpin questioned the estimated valuations used in
the fiscal year 2005-06 budget process.
Budget Director Dennis Thompson raised the question of budgeting a
collection rate less than 95.37% in order to build up fund balance and also
discussed tax rate comparisons with surrounding counties.
The Board discussed the recent Revaluation revenue that was absorbed in
the 2005/06 Budget along with projected tax revenues and growth in the
county.
Commissioner Walker compared tax revenue budgeted for fiscal year
2004-05 and fiscal year 2005-06 which reflected a $2,758,577 increase.
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Finance Director Julia Edwards
discussed the following:
·
Budget comparison table showing FY
2004-05 revenues as originally budgeted; final revised revenues; actual
revenues received; and the
variance
·
Sales tax revenue tables for Fiscal
Year 2004-05 and Fiscal Year 2005-06 through December 2005 explaining Sales Tax
Article 40, 42, 44
·
Estimate of hold harmless revenues –
scheduled to end in Fiscal Year
2011-12
·
Proposal from the State regarding
Medicaid Relief – taking back Article 39 which is a 1 cent sales tax instead of
County paying a portion of Medicaid –
Counties
would then have the option to enact an additional 1-cent sales tax
to
offset the reduced revenue
·
2004/05 Audit – Fund Balance – 7.68%
·
Sales Tax Receipts Audit
·
Possibly of extending audit contract
for one additional year before bidding out services in order to possibly save
cost if acceptable with Dixon-Hughes per Budget Director Thompson’s
recommendation
Budget
Director Dennis Thompson noted caution in continuing to budget Hold Harmless.
The
Board directed Finance Director Edwards to investigate the possibility of
extending the audit contract for one additional year with Dixon Hughes and obtain audit preparation quotes from
surrounding counties for comparison.
Commissioner
Walker requested additional information from Director Edwards regarding
services that were currently being done in-house pertaining to the audit.
Stokes County Schools
Dr. Larry Cartner noted the
following:
·
Increases for proposed 2006-07
budget (from DPI 01-30-06)
o
Retirement – 6.82%
o
Hospital Insurance –$3,854
o
Increase of $11.00 for all local
employees 82 positions=$902.00
·
Local Cost @$125,000.00 for
Governor’s salary increase & hospitalization
·
Discussed Local Supplement Increase
by .5% = $210,000.
·
Discussed Local Positions Increased
by 6 = $240,000.
·
Discussed TA Salary Scale
Implementation = $135,000.
·
Discussed ADM Capital Fund Summary
·
Discussed Supplement Summary 2004-05
·
Discussed importance of education in
Stokes County
·
54th largest system in
the state (out of 115 systems)
·
Over a $300 deficient in local
funding versus the state average
·
Currently at state average in class
sizes in elementary grades –two years ago
below
the state average
·
Governor Easley’s current focus –
high school reform – more costly that recent elementary reform
·
Presented graphs regarding 2005/06
final budget, final budget by categories, state budget, federal budget, local
current expense budget and local capital outlay budget
·
Anticipating a drastic deduction in
federal allotments
·
National push for 65% of funding
going directly to classrooms
·
Stokes County – 68-69% funding
currently going directly to classrooms
·
Local supplement is not an
expenditure – it is an investment –large amount of employees reside in Stokes
County
·
Increase local positions to decrease
class room size
·
Currently 24 local positions –
possibly in need of 6 additional local positions
·
Implementation of years of
experience scale for teacher assistants
(100 positions)
·
March 9, 2006- Board of Education
work session – one topic – demographic study
·
Explained lottery proceeds
·
No new mandates received from the
state at the current time
·
Possibly of both Boards discussing
school construction needs after Board of Education’s work session on March 9th
·
Stokes County changing – demanding
more from education
Dr.
Cartner concluded by requesting the Board to look at education as the top
priority and fund it as such.
The
Board discussed upcoming budgetary items, school construction, current building
needs, ADM funding, SRO funding, deduction in exceptional children’s program
funding, current and future operating needs, federal/state funding, state
programs that allow teachers to retire and return to the classroom, and funding
allocated for 562 teaching positions.
Commissioner
McHugh requested information regarding funding allocated for the 562 teaching
positions.
Budget
Director Dennis Thompson suggested the possibility of establishing a school
finance committee with county and school staff to develop an inventory of
financing for future school construction.
Budget
Director Thompson noted the following initial inventory of revenue sources:
·
General property
·
School dedicated sales tax
·
Public school building capital fund
·
Lottery proceeds
·
Special levy for schools
·
Additional sales tax
·
Other new revenue generators with earmarked revenues
·
Debt service reductions.
Budget
Director Thompson noted the following methods of financing for school
construction:
·
Pay as you go
·
General Obligation Bonds
·
Certificates of participation (COPS)
Commissioner
McHugh suggested the possibility of a special session for mental health issues
in Stokes County. Commissioner John
Turpin suggested the possibility of a special session for economic
development.
The
Board discussed the need to hold special sessions for mental health issues and
economic development during March.
Budget
Director Thompson briefly discussed the following sections located in the
budget manual:
·
Social Services
o
Medicaid
·
Health Department
·
Other Human Service
o
Mental Health – special session
·
Sheriff’s Department
o
Jail addition
·
Emergency Services
o
EMS Write offs
·
Other Public Safety
o
Animal Control – increase in calls
·
Public Works
o
Long
term objective – compactors at the solid waste centers
o
Vehicle
Maintenance – underground tanks
o
Vehicle
Maintenance - proposed garage
·
Economic and Community Development
o
Economic Development- Special
Session
o
Economic Development - Tourism
o
Sewer – Germanton Area
o
Proposed Walnut Cove Library Project
·
Public Records and Services –
Departments and Offices
o
GIS/Mapping – possible cost savings
with flyovers
·
Policy, Administration, Personnel
o
Group insurance for county employees
o
NCACC- BCBS to Cigna insurance
o
County Manager position
·
Other Funds
·
Statistics
·
Miscellaneous
Following
information presented by Budget Director Thompson, the Board set the following
goals for the upcoming 2006/07 budget along with future goals and objectives:
Goals for Budget 2006-2007
Other Future Goals and
Objectives
1.
Prepare
a method for preparing for the loss of hold harmless revenue
2.
Look
for revenue production opportunities, such as Jail expansion if federal inmates
housing can produce enough revenue to pay the debt service – Feasibility study
for determining cost effectiveness of adding an addition to the jail
3.
Long
term objective – compactors at the solid waste centers
4.
Prepare
to remove tanks at County Garage
5.
Extend
sewer to Germanton area
6.
Upgrade
equipment and software for GIS/mapping
7.
Evaluate
Regional Sewer program and funding
8.
Evaluate
costs and losses incurred – Stokes Reynolds Memorial Hospital
9.
Evaluate
financing options for Pinnacle EMS Station
10.
Establish
School Finance Committee
Commissioner John Turpin presented information to the Board regarding
directions being given by Planning inspectors to property owners,
misunderstanding by property owners, and working with the citizens.
Budget
Director Dennis Thompson presented an overview of the following information to
the Board regarding the Fiscal Year 2005-06 Budget Valuations:
(1) (2) (3) (4)
|
TAXABLE PROPERTY |
TAX ADMIN. MAY 2005 ESTIMATE OF TAXABLE VALUES |
ESTIMATE UPON WHICH THE FY 05-06 BUDGET WAS COMPUTED |
TAX ADMIN. FEB. 2006 ESTIMATE |
|
Real Estate |
$2,255,102,050 |
$2,313,055,345 |
$2,314,098,438 |
|
Personal Prop. |
169,500,000 |
169,500,000 |
151,400,784 |
|
Motor Vehicles |
330,000,000 |
330,000,000 |
320,000,000 |
|
Utilities |
340,000,000 |
350,000,000 |
351,742,478 |
|
TOTAL |
$3,094,602,050 |
$3,162,555,345 |
$3,137,241,700 |
Director
Thompson noted the following regarding the table:
·
Compared to the Tax Administrator’s
May 2005 estimates (column 2), the FY 2005-06 budget estimates (column 3) are
overstated by $67,953,295.
·
Current year property tax revenues
for FY 2005-06 were overstated by
$388,842
·
If correct, the amount of $388,842
that cannot be substantiated by the Tax Administrator’s estimates of values was
included in the FY 2005-06 property tax revenue and was budgeted for
expenditure
·
This amount will not be budgeted as
new revenue for the FY 2006-07 budget
Director
Thompson requested the Board verify his discovery for accuracy.
The
Board discussed the information presented by Director Thompson and directed
Clerk to the Board Darlene Bullins to request a legal opinion from County
Attorney Jonathan Jordan and an accountability opinion from Mr. Randy Brodd –
Dixon-Hughes (Auditor) and return that information to the Board
Budget
Director Thompson presented the Board with several opinions regarding
preparation, policies and procedures for the upcoming 2006-07 budget.
Following
discussion by the Board, the following recommendations were unanimously agreed
upon:
·
Authorize the Budget Director to
make recommendations in every budget category with making a “spreadsheet” to
reflect what was requested and what was recommended
·
Possibly using a computer to reflect
changes to spreadsheet as changes occur projecting on a screen
·
Tell the Budget Director not to
recommend and add a cost of living adjustment.
The Commissioners will give this matter initial and final consideration
when they deliberate on the final budget
·
Commissioners will meet any
Department Head who disagrees with the Budget Director’s recommendation
·
Complete notebook for Commissioner
McHugh along with a floating copy for other members to have during budget work
sessions
·
Commissioners will review proposed
budget calendar and make recommendations for budget work sessions and public
hearing date
The Board concluded the Budget Retreat discussing the urgent need for
special sessions for mental health issues and economic development.
The Board directed the Clerk to the Board to look at possible dates for
both special sessions with mental health special
session being first.
Chairman Inman concluded by expressing his appreciation to those in
attendance.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further
business to come before the Board, Chairman Inman entertained a motion to
adjourn the Budget Retreat.
Commissioner McHugh moved to adjourn the Budget Retreat. Commissioner John Turpin seconded and the
motion carried unanimously.
_________________________
_____________________________
Darlene M. Bullins
J. Leon Inman