)
STOKES COUNTY GOVERNMENT
COUNTY OF STOKES ) DANBURY, NORTH CAROLINA
)
DECEMBER 27, 2005
The Board of Commissioners of the County of Stokes, State of North
Carolina, met for regular session in the Commissioners’ Chambers of the Ronald
Wilson Reagan Memorial Building (Administrative Building) located in Danbury,
North Carolina on Tuesday, December 27, 2005 at 7:00 pm with the following
members present:
Chairman
Leon Inman
Vice-Chairman
Joe Turpin
Commissioner
Sandy McHugh
Commissioner
John Turpin
Commissioner
Jimmy Walker
County
Personnel in Attendance:
County
Manager Richard Morris
Clerk
to the Board Darlene Bullins
County
Attorney Jonathan Jordan
Finance
Director Julia Edwards
Tax
Administrator Wren Carmichael
Information
Systems Director Dianna Fulp
DSS
Director Jan Spencer
Health
Director Don Moore
Fire
Marshal Brad Cheek
GIS/Mapping
Administrator Jake Oakley
Chairman Leon Inman called the meeting to order.
Commissioner Walker delivered the invocation.
Chairman Inman opened the meeting by inviting the citizens in
attendance to join the Board with the Pledge of Allegiance.
PUBLIC HEARING – PROPOSED COMMUNITY
TRANSPORTATION PLAN (CTP) FISCAL YEAR 2006-07
Chairman
Inman called the Public Hearing for the Proposed Community Transportation Plan
(CTP) Fiscal Year 2006-07 to order.
There were no
public comments.
Chairman
Inman closed the Public Hearing.
Chairman Inman entertained a motion to approve or amend the minutes of
the December 6th and December 12th meetings.
Vice Chairman Joe Turpin moved to approve the minutes of the December 6th
and December 12th meetings.
Commissioner John Turpin seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
The following
spoke during public comments:
Sam Hill
1274 Hill Road
King, NC 27021
RE: Fiscal
Year Budget
Mr. Hill
reminded Board members of the unfinished job to keep taxes lower and to keep a
careful eye on spending. Mr. Hill also
expressed concerns regarding the recent revaluation and the upcoming fiscal
year budget.
GENERAL GOVERNMENT – GOVERNING BODY – NCACC SERVICES TO LOCAL
GOVERNMENT
Mr. Ed
Wooters, NCACC-Director of Member Services, spoke to the Board regarding the
assistance that the North Carolina Association of County Commissioners could
provide in the search for an interim county manager and a new county manager.
Mr. Wooters
concluded that the Association would assist the County in anyway possible in
recruiting a new manager.
The Board
discussed the timeframe of recruiting a new manager, using an interim manager,
the upcoming fiscal year budget process, and utilizing services of the
Association.
GENERAL GOVERNMENT – GOVERNING BODY – PROPOSED COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION
PLAN (CTP) – FISCAL YEAR 2006-07
Mr. Charlie Walker, YVEDDI, reported the following regarding the
Proposed Fiscal Year 2006-07 Community Transportation Plan:
·
Plan calls for $362,410 –
Administration Funding
·
Increase in
administration funding due to vehicle insurance being allowed this year to be
included in the administrative budget
·
Plan calls for $198,930
in Capital Funding
·
Proposed Capital Plan
includes the following for Stokes:
o
New computer system
o
New Lift van
o
New Center isle van
o
New Mini van
·
Tentatively matching
county funding of $11,000 for fiscal year 06/07
·
Technology funding (NCDOT
and federal funding) includes new furniture for proposed garage
·
Operating budget includes
funding for a new part time mechanic for Stokes County for the proposed garage
Mr. Walker presented Board members with the proposed Fiscal Year 2006
–07 Transportation Memorandum of Understanding that is required by NCDOT for
participation in the Fiscal Year 2006-07 Community Transportation Plan (CTP).
The Board discussed the proposed Fiscal Year 2006-07 Community
Transportation Plan (CTP) and allocation to Stokes County.
Chairman Inman entertained a motion to accept the Fiscal Year 2006-07
Community Transportation Plan for application to NCDOT.
Commissioner McHugh moved to approve the Fiscal Year 2006-07 Community
Transportation Plan to NC DOT, Memorandum of Understanding, and the tentatively
matching County administration funding of $11,000 for fiscal year 2006-07.
Vice Chairman Joe Turpin seconded and the motion carried (4-1) with
Commissioner John
Turpin voting against the motion.
GENERAL GOVERNMENT – TAX ADMINISTRATION REPORT
Tax Administrator
Wren Carmichael presented the 2006 Marshall Swift Mobile Home Pricing Guide for
the Board’s approval. Administrator
Carmichael noted that the Tax Administration would be using the “lowest
category” regarding the condition of the mobile Home for 2006.
The Board
discussed any other options available for evaluating mobile homes and the 2006
Marshall Swift Pricing Guide.
Chairman
Inman entertained a motion to approve the 2006 Marshall Swift Pricing Guide
using the “lowest category”.
Vice
Chairman Joe Turpin moved to approve the 2006 Marshall Swift Pricing Guide
using the “lowest category”.
Commissioner
John Turpin seconded the motion.
The Board
discussed whether using the “lowest category”, it would be consistent for all citizens of
Stokes County.
The motion
carried (4-1) with Commissioner Walker voting against the motion.
Tax Administrator Wren Carmichael
presented the following Real and Personal Property Tax Release in the amount of
$3,900.79:
·
Richard E. Newsome
Chairman Inman entertained a motion to approve or deny the Real and
Personal Property Tax Release Request in the amount of $3,900.79 for Richard E.
Newsome.
Vice Chairman Joe Turpin moved to approve the Real and Personal
Property Tax Release Request in the amount of $3,900.79 for Richard E.
Newsome.
Commissioner McHugh seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
Tax Administrator Carmichael briefed the Board regarding recent
bankruptcy filed by Novalis, the current tax software vendor used by
Stokes County Tax Administration.
Administrator Carmichael noted that the County had not paid Novalis for
the upcoming fiscal year 06-07 maintenance contract due to the County has been
reviewing other software companies. The
current server had to be replaced during the upcoming fiscal year 06-07;
therefore, $150,000 has already been budgeted for software and hardware
replacement.
Information Systems Director Dianna Fulp noted that the hardware is
estimated at $110,000 and the software is estimated at $165,000.
A new software vendor must be in place by July 2006 due the bankruptcy
situation and the preparation for the next revaluation.
Finance Director Julia Edwards noted that the remaining funding could
be financed.
Tax Administrator Carmichael presented a cost projection from Keystone
for the implementation of (PAAS) Property Assessment Administration System.
Tax Administrator Carmichael reiterated that the funding had been
budgeted for new software and hardware and the filing of bankruptcy has
complicated the issue for this fiscal year.
Administrator Carmichael noted that more information regarding the
current status with Novalis would be available after January 16, 2006. Currently, the County is in the process of
sending out RFP’s.
Chairman Inman requested Tax Administrator Carmichael to keep the Board
informed of any new events regarding the bankruptcy of Novalis and the County’s
current situation.
GENERAL
GOVERNMENT – FINANCE – UTILITY AND TELEPHONE AUDIT
Finance Director Julia Edwards requested the Board’s guidance in allowing
Cost Analysts, Inc. to
perform a Utility and Telephone Audit for Stokes County.
Finance Director Edwards noted the following:
·
Exempt the
sales tax audit from the proposal due to the County just completing this
process
·
Audit would
review the accuracy of billing, cost efficiency and validation of invoices
·
Cost Analysts
would receive 50% of any refunds/credits received by the County
·
Cost Analysts
would submit recommendations to be adopted at the County’s discretion. If
implemented, Cost Analysts would receive 50% for the first 24 months of actual
savings
·
The County is
under no obligation to implement any of the audit recommendations
·
Favorable
comments received from other counties who have used
Cost
Analysts, Inc.
·
Cost
Analysts, Inc. recently performed these services for the Stokes County School
System
·
Stokes County
Schools spoke highly of the services performed by Cost Analysts, Inc.
Mr. Brian Barrett, Cost Analysts, Inc. noted the following
services that would be performed:
·
Auditor will
review the way the client purchases Utilities and Telephone Services
·
Auditor will
compare client’s rates with the established and published rates for each
service
·
Auditor will
advise client of any cost saving actions that may be implemented or any
overcharges that may have been paid by the client
·
Auditor will
endeavor to collect on behalf of the client the amount of any overcharge
·
Auditor will
summarize, in writing, all available cost savings actions with the method of
measuring and/or calculating the saving clearly stated
·
Auditor will
audit utility - 2003, 2004, and 2005 and current utility invoices (36 months)
billed to Stokes County by each electric utility, gas utility, and water/sewer
municipality.
·
Audit will be
perform offsite as to not disturb the daily operation of the County
·
Auditor will
audit telephone – review client’s prior 12 month invoices and customer service
records to include current contract
The Board discussed the pros and cons of allowing Cost
Analysts, Inc. to perform a utility and telephone audit for Stokes County.
Commissioner McHugh moved to approve Costs Analysts, Inc. to
perform an audit of the County’s utilities and telephone services.
Commissioner John Turpin seconded and the motion carried
unanimously.
GENERAL
GOVERNMENT – FINANCE – USE OF CREDIT CARD PAYMENTS
Finance Director Julia Edwards requested the Board’s approval to allow
Stokes County to accept credit and debit card payments.
Director Edwards noted the following:
·
Considered Lexington
State Bank for participation
·
Must set up merchant
account
·
Following departments
have requested the service- Tax, Health, EMS, Environmental Health, King Clinic
and Planning
·
Estimated County start up
cost of $1,626
·
Machine for swiping cards
supplied by LSB at no charge
·
Charges incurred by County
when accepting a credit or debit card
·
Can only use VISA and
MasterCard credit cards
·
Transactions posted
within 48 business hours guaranteed
·
24 hour/7 days help desk
·
Monthly statements for
reconciliation
·
County would have to
apply directly to Discover and American Express
for
participation
Director Edwards concluded that other counties and cities have
experienced a higher collection rate for fees and taxes with this being
available to the citizens.
The Board discussed other software options (Vital-via internet)
available that performs the same similar service which eliminates the swiping
machine and battery backups.
The Board also discussed fees that the County would incurred by
accepting credit and debit card payments, set up fees, bidding this type of
service to other banks, and this type of service being available to County
citizens.
Chairman Inman directed Finance Director Edwards to bid out this
service to other banking institutions and investigate other software options.
GENERAL
GOVERNMENT – DSS AND HEALTH DEPARTMENTS
– SALARY GRADE RANGE REVISIONS
DSS Director Jan Spencer and Health Director Don Moore presented
information from Patrick McCoy, -Office of State Personnel regarding the salary
grade range revisions approved October 13, 2005 by State Personnel
Commission. Salary grade range
revisions are effective December 1, 2005 with mandatory implementation to be
completed by July 1, 2006. The approved
salary grade range revisions were recommended based on recent labor market
studies and related considerations.
The following job classifications affected the County’s current pay
grade scale:
§
DSS - Social Work
Supervisor II (grade 69 to 70)(one position)
§
DSS - Social Work
Supervisor III (grade72 to 73)(two positions)
§
DSS - Social Worker II (grade
66 to 67)(five positions)
§
DSS – Social Worker III
(grade 68 to 69)(four positions)
§
Health – Social Worker II
(grade 66 to 67)(two positions)
Directors Spencer and Moore requested implementation of the salary
grade range revisions to be effective with the next pay period using lapsed
salaries for funding for the remainder of fiscal year 05/06. Both directors noted the immediate need for
implementation for recruiting vacant positions, especially for DSS – Social
Workers for Foster Care.
The Board discussed implementing the salary grade ranges with the
upcoming fiscal year 2006/07 and loss of state funding if new salary ranges are
not implemented by July 1, 2006.
Chairman Inman entertained a motion regarding the implementation of the
revised salary grade range by the State Personnel Commission.
Vice Chairman Joe Turpin moved to approve the motion to maintain the
current salary ranges until mandated July 1, 2006 with the budgetary
process.
The motion died for lack of a second.
Commissioner Walker moved to approve the salary grade range revisions
effective Friday, January 13, 2006 – 5:01pm.
Chairman Inman seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
GENERAL
GOVERNMENT – FIRE MARSHAL – FIRE DISTRICTS REVISIONS
Fire Marshal Brad Cheek requested the Board’s approval to change the
following three parcels from the Sauratown Fire District to the South Stokes
Fire District:
·
Thelma T. Bowman
·
Thelma T. Bowman
·
Wayne Wallace Alley
(GIS/Mapping Administrator presented Board members with a map of the
current fire districts and the requested fire district changes- copies will be
retained by the Clerk to the Board and the Fire Marshal)
The three mentioned parcels were not in an insurance district but are
located within five miles from South Stokes Fire Department. In order to be eligible for an insurance
district, (which reduces homeowner’s insurance premium) the parcel must be
located within 5 miles of a fire department.
The change has occurred to allow the three parcels to be included in an
insurance district (South Stokes Fire Department).
Each fire department has consented to allow the fire district change
for the three mentioned parcels. Fire
Marshal Cheek recommended the fire district change for the three mentioned
parcels. It is preferred for each
parcel to have the same insurance and fire district.
Commissioner McHugh moved to approve to change the following three
parcels from the Sauratown Fire District to the South Stokes Fire District
which changes the actual written fire departments’ boundaries that is recorded
in the Register of Deeds for their response districts and changes the EOC
boundaries for dispatch purposes.
·
Thelma T. Bowman
·
Thelma T. Bowman
·
Wayne Wallace Alley
Commissioner John Turpin seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
GENERAL
GOVERNMENT – GIS/MAPPING – LYNCHBURG ROAD
GIS/Mapping Administrator Jake Oakley informed the Board that the State
of North Carolina has changed the name of Lynchburg Road to NC HWY 268. Administrator Oakley noted the following
regarding changing Lynchburg Road to NC HWY 268:
·
County currently has 32
individuals addressed as Lynchburg Road that is now HWY 268
·
If these addresses are
changed, then everyone from HWY 89 to the Surry County line would have to be
changed which would require changing 191 addresses
Administrator Oakley recommended to leave the name as Lynchburg Road,
this will not effect dispatching emergency service vehicles to this area.
The Board discussed the associated problems of changing all the
addresses.
Commissioner McHugh moved to leave Lynchburg Road as it is.
Commissioner John Turpin seconded and the motion carried unanimously.
GENERAL
GOVERNMENT – HEALTH DEPARTMENT – PROPOSAL – UTILIZATION OF KING CLINIC
Health Director Don Moore reported to the Board as requested that there
was no available space at JR Jones to use for a King Clinic, the use of a used
ambulance does not provide adequate space for primary use, and the use of a
portable mobile clinic is very expensive to purchase and operate.
Director Moore recommended the best option to provide primary care
outside of Danbury is the building recently used as the King Clinic. Director Moore noted the start-up funding
for the King Clinic would be approximately $26,000.
Director Moore reiterated the need for primary care, family care
coordination services, and WIC services in the area.
The Board discussed the need for services in the area, concerns that
all areas in the County are provided medical services, cost savings for health
department, time savings for health department personnel, population density of
King, and services previously offered at the clinic.
Commissioner Walker moved to approve the motion to accept Health
Director Moore’s recommendation to reopen the King Clinic.
Chairman Inman seconded and the motion failed (2-3) with Commissioner
McHugh, Vice Chairman Joe Turpin, and Commissioner John Turpin voting against
the motion.
GENERAL GOVERNMENT – FINANCE - BUDGET ORDINANCE AMENDMENT #47
Finance Director Julia Edwards requested the approval of Budget Ordinance
Amendment #47, which is necessary to amend the General Fund, Revaluation Fund,
and Walnut Cove Senior Center Fund for middle year review. The appropriations are to be changed as follows:
|
Account
Number |
|
EXPENDITURES |
|
Decrease |
|
Increase |
|
|
|
See Attachment below:
|
|
$266,784.00 |
|
$544,045.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
$266,784.00 |
|
$544,045.00 |
|
Account |
REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Number |
|
Decrease |
|
Increase |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
General Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.3831.450 |
Interest on Investment |
|
|
$ 150,000.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
100.3344.411 |
Revenue Stamps |
|
|
$ 3,005.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
100.3301.257 |
Carolina Access II |
$ 68,250.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.3301.214 |
State Foster Care |
$ 20,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.3301.215 |
EA Foster Care |
|
|
$ 60,000.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
100.3301.213 |
IV-E Foster Care |
|
|
$ 63,405.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
100.3301.410 |
Federal Inmate Reimbursement |
|
|
$ 4,000.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
100.3301.412 |
State Inmate Reimbursement |
|
|
$ 22,000.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
100.3586.450 |
Senior Services Program Income |
|
|
$ 1,000.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
100.3839.004 |
Senior Services Miscellaneous |
|
|
$ 1,226.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
100.3301.364 |
NCDOT-Workfirst |
$ 6,125.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.3540.420 |
DSS Medicaid CAP/DA |
|
|
$ 67,000.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
$ 94,375.00 |
|
$ 371,636.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
General Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Account |
EXPENDITURES |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Number |
|
Decrease |
|
Increase |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Governing Body |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4110.101 |
401K |
$
150.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4110.130 |
Unemployment
Insurance |
|
|
$
1,210.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4110.311 |
Training |
$ 1,060.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4110.450 |
Insurance |
|
|
$ 50,425.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Unemployment
Insurance invoice was $1,210 more than budget. |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
The
Property/Liability insurance was higher than estimated and |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
an adjustment
to Workmen's Comp of $29.131. |
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Finance |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4130.510 |
Equipment |
|
|
5,400.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4130.511 |
Equipment Non
Capitalized |
5,400.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Tax Administration |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4140.000 |
Salaries |
|
|
5,385.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4140.090 |
Social
Security |
575.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4140.091 |
Medicare Tax |
125.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4140.101 |
401K |
900.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4140.110 |
Group
Insurance |
590.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4140.340 |
Printing |
2,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4140.390 |
Tax
Settlement |
1,120.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4140.450 |
Insurance and
Bond |
75.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
GIS/Mapping |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4141.000 |
Salaries |
|
|
3,840.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4141.020 |
Salaries-Part
Time |
500.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4141.090 |
Social
Security |
400.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4141.100 |
Retirement |
|
|
50.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4141.101 |
401K |
150.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4141.310 |
Travel |
359.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4141.311 |
Training |
500.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4141.340 |
Printing |
100.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4141.440 |
Misc.
Contractual Services |
400.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Elections |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4170.000 |
Salaries |
|
|
7,010.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4170.090 |
Social
Security |
|
|
350.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4170.091 |
Medicare Tax |
|
|
80.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4170.100 |
Retirement |
|
|
300.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4170.101 |
401K |
|
|
60.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4170.511 |
Equipment Non
Capitalized |
|
|
4,243.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Correct on
budget for salaries and appropriate HAVA grant funds |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
that was
collected in fiscal year 2004-05.
Therefore, the funds |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
need to be
re-appropriated in fiscal year 2005-06. |
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Register of Deeds |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4180.000 |
Salaries |
|
|
3,325.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4180.020 |
Salaries Part
Time |
1,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4180.090 |
Social
Security |
100.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4180.101 |
401K |
370.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4180.170 |
Other Fringe
Pension |
|
|
1,150.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Revenue from
revenue stamps for these expenses. |
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Public Buildings |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4190.000 |
Salaries |
|
|
1,850.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4190.090 |
Social
Security |
1,150.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4190.091 |
Medicare Tax |
150.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4190.110 |
Group
Insurance |
450.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4190.311 |
Training |
100.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Information Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4210.000 |
Salaries |
|
|
5,500.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4210.090 |
Social
Security |
1,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4210.091 |
Medicare Tax |
25.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4210.100 |
Retirement |
300.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4210.490 |
Dues &
Subscription |
350.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Vehicle Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4250.000 |
Salaries |
1,300.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4250.090 |
Social
Security |
200.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4250.101 |
401K |
400.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4250.110 |
Group
Insurance |
135.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Sheriff's Department |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4310.000 |
Salaries |
7,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4310.101 |
401K |
270.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Jail |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4320.000 |
Salaries |
2,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4320.101 |
401K |
2,465.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4320.330 |
Utilities |
|
|
26,000.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Emerg. Communications |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4325.000 |
Salaries |
10,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4325.010 |
Salaries
Overtime |
8,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4325.250 |
Auto Supplies |
200.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Emergency Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4330.090 |
Social
Security |
350.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Fire & Rescue |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4340.510 |
Equipment |
2,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Medical Examine |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4360.000 |
Professional
Services |
|
|
10,000.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Emerg. Medical Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4370.000 |
Salaries |
60,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4370.010 |
Salaries
Overtime |
|
|
50,000.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4370.020 |
Salaries Part
Time |
|
|
50,000.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4370.090 |
Social
Security |
|
|
1,000.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4370.091 |
Medicare Tax |
|
|
200.00 |
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4370.101 |
401K |
2,000.00 |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
100.4370.110 |
Group
Insurance |
|
|
2,100.00 |
| ||||||||